Friday, December 10, 2010
Final Blog Reflection
Personal Technology Project
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Engl 312 Rhetorical Analysis- Source for Paper C
Thursday, November 18, 2010
English 312-RA for Conference Talk
Week 1- Proposal for Personal Technology Project
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Internet Safety- Talking with a parent
Friday, November 12, 2010
IPT 286- Internet Safety Articles and Videos
Monday, November 8, 2010
Multimedia Project- Instructional Video
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
English 312- RA for Paper A
Monday, November 1, 2010
IPT 286- Participation
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Engl 312 Rhetorical Analysis -Encounter
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Multimedia Project- Week 1 Storyboard
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Rhetorical Analysis for Music Video-Engl 312
Monday, October 18, 2010
Copyright: Bill of Rights Content Trailer by Brandon R
Copyright on Digital Documentary: A social studies lesson
IPT286- Copyright
Monday, October 11, 2010
Cool Video for Social Studies Teachers!!
Class Website
Friday, October 8, 2010
Rhetorical Analysis for Film Trailer
The Company Men
1. The argument of this film trailer is that working men in America do not need to be ashamed of losing their jobs or having financial problems because the economy has been hard on several men who work hard to support their families.
2. The audience includes working men in America who have lost their job or had economic hardships because of the economy, have a family to support, and are frustrated with the poor economy.
3. The goal of this film trailer is not only to get the audience to see the film, but to instill hope within the working men of America that they can find ways to support their families and be proud of themselves.
4. The film trailer tries to accomplish the goal of instilling hope within working American men through several elements of rhetoric.
Pathos- The trailer uses probably its strongest persuasive tool with the element of pathos to instill certain emotions such as sympathy, heartache and hope. The trailer depicts scenes of the main character, Ben Affleck, being with his family and wife to gain sympathy with the audience when he loses his job. The trailer also shows the wife and main character crying and trying to care for their family which evokes the emotions of heartache and once again sympathy. The trailer also plays inspirational music at the end along with scenes of Ben Affleck finding several ways to get work, which evokes hope within the audience.
Ethos- The film trailer uses the element of ethos to persuade the audience towards the goal of seeing the move and instilling hope within the audience. This is done through the use of “name-dropping” or displaying the faces and names of prominent actors such as Ben Affleck, Kevin Costner and Chris Cooper. By showing actors that have had successful movies in the past and have credibility, the trailer brings authority to its film and its message.
Typical- Another element of rhetoric the film trailer utilizes is presenting an argument that is acceptable to its audience. This issue is an extremely relevant issue to its audience, since the economy is a hot topic for almost all working men in America and several men with families have been affected by it. It is very representative of its audience, and real concerns and issues that the audience is dealing with. The trailer also does not fall too much under “Ad Populum” or jumping on the bandwagon of complaining of economic issues because it presents a positive argument.
Relevant- The relevance of the trailer is a weak point for the argument. There are several love scenes between the husband and wife, while although they might evoke the emotions of love and passion and apply to pathos, seem to have little if any relevance to the main goal of the trailer. However, this type of relationship would be relevant to the audience of working men who have a healthy relationship with their own wife.
5. Due to its extremely persuasive use of pathos and its relevance to its audience, this film trailer is very successful in both its argument and goal of not only getting people to see the film, but sympathizing with the hardships of this economy and instilling hope into the hearts of frustrated working middle-aged men in America.
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Rhetorical Analysis- Source for Paper A
“Terror Mosque at Ground Zero: 3 Things Sarah Palin Doesn’t Want You to Know” BYU Political Review, September 2010- Vol. 6, Issue 1
Summary: This article talks about the “terror mosque” that Sarah Palin, Fox News and Newt Gingrich speculate would be a headquarters for radical Islam. The article lists out three facts that are not mentioned, however, with either of these other sources. It states how 1) the “terror mosque” is not strictly a mosque, but part of a complex called Park51. The second fact it states is that 2) the mosque is not at ground zero, but on the ashes of a former Burlington Coat Factory around the corner from ground zero. The last point made is that 3) the mosque is not sponsored by terrorists but by Mr. Gamal, a real estate broker who also leases trendy lofts in NYC’s TriBeCa neighborhood.
1. The argument of this article is that the mosque being built in NYC is not a “terror mosque”, contrary to what has been said by previous sources such as Sarah Palin and Fox News.
2. The audience includes conservative BYU students who have listened to Sarah Palin, Fox News and Newt Gingrich speculate about the building of the mosque in NYC, and have not heard information from any other sources.
3. The goal of this article is to enable students with the facts and make students aware of their responsibility as citizens to respect and uphold not only their own rights, but the rights of others.
4. The speaker tries to make the argument that the mosque is not a “terror mosque” through the use of several elements of rhetoric.
Logos- Logos is one of the most prevalent uses of rhetoric in this article. The whole article is based on the premise of “3 facts”, thus taking every argument opposing sources have said and countering it with a fact. For example, the mosque has been called “terror mosque” but the article states how it is not strictly a mosque but part of a community complex. The article also states how the article is not right on top of ground zero, but several blocks away on the remains of a dilapidated building. By countering these arguments with facts, the speaker uses logic to persuade the audience to understand the argument that the mosque is not a terrorist building.
Pathos- The article also uses pathos to persuade the audience that the mosque is not just a terror mosque. The article talks about the only other mosque in the area of Manhattan is overcrowded to the point that worshippers are forced to say their prayers in the streets and they have nowhere to go. This imagery conjures up the emotion of sympathy for the Muslim people, because they are limited in their ability to worship. The speaker is utilizing the emotion of sympathy to motivate the audience to have compassion on these people and realize that there are not terrorist connections with them or a mosque being built.
Sufficient- The speaker does use sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mosque does not have terrorist motivations or connections. The speaker does give detailed evidence on the type of building the mosque will be a part of including a pool, gym, theater, multi-faith worship center and an area with public rooms open for reservation. The article talks about how it would be similar to a YMCA. The article also talks in detail about the location of the mosque and the person in charge of its building, thus giving plenty of evidence to achieve the article’s goal of informing BYU students with the facts.
Typical- The speaker is reasonable and knowledgeable and presents evidence that would be acceptable to BYU students. Rather than using Ad Populum, or jumping on the band wagon, the author uses a different point of view that would still be representative of the concerns of BYU students such as the religious freedom of others in the United States. The speaker uses facts, such as the building of the Park51 complex that would be something BYU students would be familiar with, such as a stake center with basketball courts and areas for receptions.
5. Due to its sufficient evidence, and relevance to BYU students, this article was very effective in accomplishing its goal of informing BYU students with the facts that the mosque in NYC is not a “terror mosque”. The use of logic and emotions such as sympathy and compassion is a persuasive combination in order to accomplish the goal of students realizing the rights of the Muslim people in having their own worship center.
Friday, October 1, 2010
Ning!!!!
Sunday, September 26, 2010
IPT286- Tip for Geography Teachers
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Rhetorical Analysis for Song Lyrics
Deep Blue Something- "Breakfast at Tiffany's"
You'll say, we've got nothing in common
No common ground to start from
And we're falling apart
You'll say, the world has come between us
Our lives have come between us
Still I know you just don't care
And I said, "what about 'Breakfast at Tiffany's?'"
She said, "I think I remember the film
And as I recall, i think, we both kind of liked it"
And I said, "well that's, one thing we've got"
I see you, the only one who knew me
And now your eyes see through me
I guess I was wrong
So what now, it's plain to see we're over
And I hate when things are over
When so much is left undone
And I said, "what about 'Breakfast at Tiffany's?'"
She said, "I think I, remember the film
And, as I recall, I think, we both kind of liked it"
And I said, "well that's, one thing we gots"
You'll say, that we've got nothing in common
No common ground to start from
And we're falling apart
You'll say the world has come between us
Our lives have come between us
Still I know you just don't care
And I said, "what about 'Breakfast at Tiffany's?'"
She said, "I think I, remember that film
And, as I recall, I think, we both kind of liked it"
And I said, "well that's, one thing we gots"
1. The argument of these song lyrics is that the audience and the speaker should continue their relationship because they have common interests such as both liking the movie ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s”.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
PLN
Friday, September 17, 2010
Engl 312-Rhetorical Analysis for TV Commercial
Old Spice Commercial-Click me!!!
1. The argument of this TV commercial is that the overall quality of life for men will improve if they use Old Spice deodorant.
2. The audience includes women that are in a relationship with a man and is concerned about the way their significant other smells.
3. The goal of this advertisement is to get women to buy Old Spice deodorant for their significant other.
4. The commercial tries to accomplish its goal of getting women to buy Old Spice deodorant for men in several elements of rhetoric.
Ethos- The commercial uses the element of ethos to appeal to authority. The commercial does this by using a physically attractive male who immediately demands your attention at the beginning of the commercial by commanding “look at me, now look at your man, now back at me”. This immediately builds up a sense of respect and authority from the speaker, and helps build up the credibility of the commercial.
Pathos- The commercial uses the element of pathos to appeal to certain emotions, specifically sexual appeal and humor. The speaker is an attractive male who does not wear a shirt for the entire commercial, conveniently displaying his athletic physique. The commercial is subconsciously projecting the emotion of sexual appeal, and persuading women to buy Old Spice deodorant because then their man will be just as attractive. The commercial also has several random comments such as tickets turning into diamonds, and the speaker suddenly appearing on a horse to appeal to the emotion of humor in the commercial. By inserting humor, the commercial is more memorable and people associate this good emotion with Old Spice deodorant.
Sufficient- Despite the effective use of the element of pathos, the commercial in reality lacks sufficient evidence to support its argument that Old Spice deodorant will improve the overall quality of life for men. There are no statistics, no studies, no personal witnesses, or any other solid evidence to support the claim.
Accurate- The commercial also is not completely accurate because it is not completely fair because it makes the mistake of the “straw-man fallacy”. It sets up an extremely weak counterargument of saying that men need to “stop wearing lady-scented body wash”. Any men’s deodorant would be appealing compared to women’s body wash, however, most men probably do not use ladies body wash, therefore making this an inaccurate counterargument.
5. Despite its inaccuracy and lack of sufficient evidence, the commercial is effective for an audience of women in a significant relationship. It appeals to the emotion of humor, making it funny and memorable and something women will most likely remember to mention to their significant other, and most likely buy.
Word Count: 445
Friday, September 10, 2010
English 312 Rhetorical Analysis-Still Advertisement
1. The argument of this Advertisement is that the Kimberly-Clark Kleenex Company is killing the Canadian Boreal Forest because they are cutting down trees to make facial tissues.
2. The audience ranges from teenagers to adults in the U.S. and Canada who care about the environment, endangered animals, the fight against global warming and the Boreal Forest of Canada. The audience also includes those who have access to a phone or internet and can contact the Kimberly-Clark Company to voice their complaints with Kleenex.
3. The goal of this Advertisement is to contact the Kimberly-Clark Company to voice a complaint against Kleenex and to stop buying Kimberly-Clark Kleenex facial tissues.
4. The Advertisement tries to accomplish their goal of stopping consumers from buying Kleenex by using all three elements of rhetoric. The Advertisement uses ethos by appealing to authority with the endorsement of GREENPEACE on the bottom right-hand corner of the advertisement. This is a well-known organization among environmentalists, and this will help build up the credibility and authority of the advertisement. The advertisement uses pathos by posting a picture of a Kleenex box with cut-down trees as the design on the Kleenex box to emphasize the idea that buying a box of Kleenex is the same as killing several trees. It appeals to the emotion of guilt, by making buyers of Kleenex feel guilty for destroying the environment. It also appeals to the emotion of guilt with its instructions of how to kill the Boreal Forest being simply 1. Pulling out a Kleenex tissue, 2. Putting it to your nose and 3. Blowing. The oversimplification of this once again draws attention to the simple act of blowing your nose being the same as killing trees. The advertisement also uses logos to persuade the audience not to buy Kleenex tissues. In the fine print, it explains how the Kimberly-Clark company contributes to the destruction of the Canadian Boreal Forest by cutting down trees for its facial tissues. The advertisement also explains how the forest is home to several endangered species of migratory birds and is an aid in the fight against global warming. The fine print also explains how the Kimberly-Clark company could use more recyclable products to make its tissues, using logic to persuade the audience to stop buying Kleenex and tell Kimberly-Clark company to use different products.
5. The Advertisement is effective for an environmentalist audience that is concerned about the Boreal Forest. However, the logos or logic is not completely convincing because it is unclear what exactly the “more recyclable products” or alternative to Kleenex would be. Blowing your nose is an issue everyone faces, and the need for a disposable tissue is there and the advertisement does not effectively propose an alternate option.
Word Count: 450
Monday, September 6, 2010
ABOUT ME! -IPT 286
So this is my first post for IPT286, and I thought I would start by sharing a little bit about me. My name is Amanda, I'm 20, and a Social Science Teaching major. I also have a minor in Teaching English as a Second Language. I'm from Fort Collins, Colorado and I love to play soccer, run, and do just about anything outdoors. This is a picture of me in Jerusalem, where I lived for four months this summer, and my background template is also a picture I took of Jerusalem. My real passion is to travel and learn about other cultures.