Sunday, September 26, 2010
IPT286- Tip for Geography Teachers
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Rhetorical Analysis for Song Lyrics
Deep Blue Something- "Breakfast at Tiffany's"
You'll say, we've got nothing in common
No common ground to start from
And we're falling apart
You'll say, the world has come between us
Our lives have come between us
Still I know you just don't care
And I said, "what about 'Breakfast at Tiffany's?'"
She said, "I think I remember the film
And as I recall, i think, we both kind of liked it"
And I said, "well that's, one thing we've got"
I see you, the only one who knew me
And now your eyes see through me
I guess I was wrong
So what now, it's plain to see we're over
And I hate when things are over
When so much is left undone
And I said, "what about 'Breakfast at Tiffany's?'"
She said, "I think I, remember the film
And, as I recall, I think, we both kind of liked it"
And I said, "well that's, one thing we gots"
You'll say, that we've got nothing in common
No common ground to start from
And we're falling apart
You'll say the world has come between us
Our lives have come between us
Still I know you just don't care
And I said, "what about 'Breakfast at Tiffany's?'"
She said, "I think I, remember that film
And, as I recall, I think, we both kind of liked it"
And I said, "well that's, one thing we gots"
1. The argument of these song lyrics is that the audience and the speaker should continue their relationship because they have common interests such as both liking the movie ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s”.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
PLN
Friday, September 17, 2010
Engl 312-Rhetorical Analysis for TV Commercial
Old Spice Commercial-Click me!!!
1. The argument of this TV commercial is that the overall quality of life for men will improve if they use Old Spice deodorant.
2. The audience includes women that are in a relationship with a man and is concerned about the way their significant other smells.
3. The goal of this advertisement is to get women to buy Old Spice deodorant for their significant other.
4. The commercial tries to accomplish its goal of getting women to buy Old Spice deodorant for men in several elements of rhetoric.
Ethos- The commercial uses the element of ethos to appeal to authority. The commercial does this by using a physically attractive male who immediately demands your attention at the beginning of the commercial by commanding “look at me, now look at your man, now back at me”. This immediately builds up a sense of respect and authority from the speaker, and helps build up the credibility of the commercial.
Pathos- The commercial uses the element of pathos to appeal to certain emotions, specifically sexual appeal and humor. The speaker is an attractive male who does not wear a shirt for the entire commercial, conveniently displaying his athletic physique. The commercial is subconsciously projecting the emotion of sexual appeal, and persuading women to buy Old Spice deodorant because then their man will be just as attractive. The commercial also has several random comments such as tickets turning into diamonds, and the speaker suddenly appearing on a horse to appeal to the emotion of humor in the commercial. By inserting humor, the commercial is more memorable and people associate this good emotion with Old Spice deodorant.
Sufficient- Despite the effective use of the element of pathos, the commercial in reality lacks sufficient evidence to support its argument that Old Spice deodorant will improve the overall quality of life for men. There are no statistics, no studies, no personal witnesses, or any other solid evidence to support the claim.
Accurate- The commercial also is not completely accurate because it is not completely fair because it makes the mistake of the “straw-man fallacy”. It sets up an extremely weak counterargument of saying that men need to “stop wearing lady-scented body wash”. Any men’s deodorant would be appealing compared to women’s body wash, however, most men probably do not use ladies body wash, therefore making this an inaccurate counterargument.
5. Despite its inaccuracy and lack of sufficient evidence, the commercial is effective for an audience of women in a significant relationship. It appeals to the emotion of humor, making it funny and memorable and something women will most likely remember to mention to their significant other, and most likely buy.
Word Count: 445
Friday, September 10, 2010
English 312 Rhetorical Analysis-Still Advertisement
1. The argument of this Advertisement is that the Kimberly-Clark Kleenex Company is killing the Canadian Boreal Forest because they are cutting down trees to make facial tissues.
2. The audience ranges from teenagers to adults in the U.S. and Canada who care about the environment, endangered animals, the fight against global warming and the Boreal Forest of Canada. The audience also includes those who have access to a phone or internet and can contact the Kimberly-Clark Company to voice their complaints with Kleenex.
3. The goal of this Advertisement is to contact the Kimberly-Clark Company to voice a complaint against Kleenex and to stop buying Kimberly-Clark Kleenex facial tissues.
4. The Advertisement tries to accomplish their goal of stopping consumers from buying Kleenex by using all three elements of rhetoric. The Advertisement uses ethos by appealing to authority with the endorsement of GREENPEACE on the bottom right-hand corner of the advertisement. This is a well-known organization among environmentalists, and this will help build up the credibility and authority of the advertisement. The advertisement uses pathos by posting a picture of a Kleenex box with cut-down trees as the design on the Kleenex box to emphasize the idea that buying a box of Kleenex is the same as killing several trees. It appeals to the emotion of guilt, by making buyers of Kleenex feel guilty for destroying the environment. It also appeals to the emotion of guilt with its instructions of how to kill the Boreal Forest being simply 1. Pulling out a Kleenex tissue, 2. Putting it to your nose and 3. Blowing. The oversimplification of this once again draws attention to the simple act of blowing your nose being the same as killing trees. The advertisement also uses logos to persuade the audience not to buy Kleenex tissues. In the fine print, it explains how the Kimberly-Clark company contributes to the destruction of the Canadian Boreal Forest by cutting down trees for its facial tissues. The advertisement also explains how the forest is home to several endangered species of migratory birds and is an aid in the fight against global warming. The fine print also explains how the Kimberly-Clark company could use more recyclable products to make its tissues, using logic to persuade the audience to stop buying Kleenex and tell Kimberly-Clark company to use different products.
5. The Advertisement is effective for an environmentalist audience that is concerned about the Boreal Forest. However, the logos or logic is not completely convincing because it is unclear what exactly the “more recyclable products” or alternative to Kleenex would be. Blowing your nose is an issue everyone faces, and the need for a disposable tissue is there and the advertisement does not effectively propose an alternate option.
Word Count: 450
Monday, September 6, 2010
ABOUT ME! -IPT 286
So this is my first post for IPT286, and I thought I would start by sharing a little bit about me. My name is Amanda, I'm 20, and a Social Science Teaching major. I also have a minor in Teaching English as a Second Language. I'm from Fort Collins, Colorado and I love to play soccer, run, and do just about anything outdoors. This is a picture of me in Jerusalem, where I lived for four months this summer, and my background template is also a picture I took of Jerusalem. My real passion is to travel and learn about other cultures.